Jump to content

Talk:Ruthenium

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleRuthenium has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 20, 2010Good article nomineeListed

References

[edit]
  • Chemistry of precious metals by Simon Cotton
  • Elements of Metallurgy and Engineering Alloys by F. C. Campbell
  • The radiochemistry of ruthenium by Edward I. Wyatt, Robert R. Rickard
  • Electronic Materials Handbook by Merrill L. Minges
  • doi:10.1007/BF00701448 An evaluation of some commercial thick film resistor materials for strain gauges

Chemical combustion.

[edit]

I read a while ago ruthenium will ignite methane gas. Any article to solidify this claim would be great. A fascinating property if it does. 24.244.23.239 (talk) 15:41, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quite a few articles at https://scholar.google.co.uk/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=ruthenium+methane+combustion&oq=ruthenium+methane+c - a start to answering your question. Ben (talk) 16:54, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Some issues with the origin of the name Rutenium.

[edit]

@Mellk reverted five edits with a brief and, well, obnoxious edit summary "Complete nonsense". I returned the 5 edits and ask for a proper explanation. Johnjbarton (talk) 03:01, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The source refers to the name of a medieval polity and not about ruthenium. The part about naming refers to the 19th-century. Please read the policy on WP:NOR and self-revert. Mellk (talk) 03:05, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
We already have a source to support the statement that "he chose the Latin name for Russia used back in the day, Ruthenia, as the basis for his name". Why do you insist on using a source that refers to the naming of something else? The name did not refer to Ukraine in the 19th century, this is indeed complete nonsense. Mellk (talk) 03:08, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes it did, see:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Austria_hungary_1911.jpg
or
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Linguistic_and_political_map_of_Eastern_Europe,_Casimir_Delamarre,_1868.jpg Shahray (talk) 15:33, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ruthenia is an ambiguous term, but Claus specified the meaning by saying that he named the element after his motherland (Russia). (sources: [1],[2]) No source seems to discuss Ukraine in this context, so neither should we. Jähmefyysikko (talk) 05:46, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There are other sources that were cited, while it was meant as Latin name for Russia, generally it refers to the territory of Ukraine. Shahray (talk) 15:30, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Shahray The other possible meaning of the name are not relevant here. The sources clearly point out that the name chosen by the discoverer was intended to mean his "Motherland", Russia, and that he chose the Latin name for that purpose.
The word "Russia" does derive from "Rus" which does refer to the people from the area around modern Kiev, Ukraine. But that line of connection is not what the sources on the naming of Ruthenium refer to.
Please don't change the article to the "Ukraine" version now that three editors have agreed to the "Russia" version. Johnjbarton (talk) 15:40, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Very well, I agree. Still as this term generally refers to territory of modern Ukraine, will it make sense to add a brief mention of this in history segment? Shahray (talk) 15:46, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
My opinion: Only if there are reliable sources that discuss the element and consider that the name Claus chose is somehow incorrect. Otherwise it seems too tangential. Jähmefyysikko (talk) 15:57, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Jähmefyysikko Thanks, I used those refs to fix a similar issue in Template:infobox ruthenium. Johnjbarton (talk) 15:35, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]