User talk:Trey Stone

This user may have left Wikipedia. Trey Stone has not edited Wikipedia since July 2009. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

:-).90.244.92.137 (talk) 15:33, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Trey Stone! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 4 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 262 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Carlos Humberto Romero - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Sergio Valech - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Jorge Alberto Uribe - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Anastasio Somoza Portocarrero - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 21:07, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:50, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of JEM Management Corp. for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article JEM Management Corp. is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JEM Management Corp. (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mercurywoodrose (talk) 19:39, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"Corporate media" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Corporate media. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 March 27#Corporate media until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 04:37, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Colossus of the North

The article Colossus of the North has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:NOTFORUM,WP:OR, WP:NOTNEO,WP:UNSOURCED

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]